i think this article is missing the point... i think the more important question is "Is you're husband worth the wait?" and i think...

the answer is obvious.

which actually comes from the question, "Is sex important?"

it's fine if someone chooses to wait for her husband. that's her choice, and people must respect that. but they also should not go around

telling women that premarital sex, and having had more than one sex partner, will damage a woman mentally and emotionally. that is untrue.

we would never would we... the thing is we would never know that we are damaged until a certain point. but then again...

i think the simple answer to all of this is respect... we couldn't blame those who believe that pms is damaging to be very vocal of what

as a woman who admittedly has had more than one partner and who has friends who also had more than one patner, we would be the ones to tell

people who believe otherwise that we are emotionally and mentally fine. in fact, stress from academics is something, by experience,

i consider far more damaging.

they believe in and try to convince others of what they think is true. These information, including what was in the study, just gives us

the choice to which we want to believe and be our guides in our lives.

i could not have said it better myself.

this we are talking about is based on experience which is highly relative. again, the key is respect. there are alot of things the world is

telling us, it's up to us which one we'll believe. so let's not judge one another and simply respect what we believe in.

it's all for the sake of free exchange of ideas.