I recognize peoples right to have an opinion about these things

but don't be talking out of your arse with "facts" that you have no clue or proof of

Any way you can slide in a few corrections?

the woman touting off is my "nemisis" here, she's the kind of woman is is always right, always best, always number 1

she is saying that all poligamists are molesters and cults and rapists

Is she including serial polygamists, like, oh, Elizabeth Taylor?

Tanarian:

Really! And all those evangelists, and Ronald Reagan, and ...some people who aren't actors.

(My father married five times. She gonna talk smack about a hero of Israel?)

OH,so that is what that annoying echo is coming from her cubical. good to know!

never knew that Elizabeth Taylor and Reagan had more than one spouse at a time.

SERIAL polygamy.

A whole bunch, one at a time.

Isn't that like having three meals daily for a week and then calling it a massive feast?

Noooo.

Why not?

Convention suggests only one spouse, ever (not saying it's correct, just what's implied). So, more like having your meal, walking away from

...the table, going out to a restaurant and pigging out.\

I must say I'd never heard of the term "serial polygamy" before today. Is it one of those delightful Americanisms?

And I still think it's like calling a week of 3 meals a day a feast! So there. :3

Nah, armchair socioanthropology or something.

Why not call it serial marriage? Since that's what it is.

Serial monogamy would be kind of a contradiction in terms - "mono" would prevent "serial", eh?

You'd think, hm? :3

'Cause there's all SORTS of marriage. The terminology specifies what kind in relation to the subject in question.

Mm. Feast.

I dont think I would label multi marriages as serial poligamy... serial monogamy, yes... serial poligamy, no.