suuure it was
They should just come out and admit that the big, overarching joke is PETA itself
If they're as concerned about the purportedly real (I say this even though I have no reason to not believe it's a legitimate issue) problem_
regarding skinning these animals, shouldn't they try legitimately educating people instead of producing shock site crap with NEGATIVE_
information?
Not that PETA can do anything right.
They can't tell their brains from their rectums.
Remember that time when Jack Thompson made the statement he'd pay $10,000 to charity if EA made a game about killing developers?
you're asking if the people who wanted to make a porn site interspersed with graphic pictures of animal abuse can do something without_
And then it was made? And then he said it was a "joke"?
Especially with how long when has been sunk into the other?
shock factor
Yeah, this is true.
MageKiros: I do, actually! I just think about it very rarely. That's a good one, too, but Jack Thompson makes plague germs look smart.
I'm drawing parallels to this is all. nod
Oh, it
's perfectly understandable.*
In both cases, we're dealing with black holes of intelligence.
People who fail to critically think or think ahead and give Post Ad Hoc excuses to their actions, indeed. ^_^;
Really, the quickest response to it that I can think of is when any "normal" troll (and I don't think that's not an apt description for_
PETA anyway) backpedals to the phrase "social experiment" after getting called out.
I don't quite notice that very much, but it's understandable why that would happen. PETA just... is completely backwards.
what about cooking mama kills animals
The big thing for me is, more than the stupidity involved in projects like this, the connection to arsonists, etc. that PETA has. And that_
they kill more animals than they save.
Exactly.
Yeah. Also all of the other money spent on useless shit that basically just exists to gain mass publicity.
That's why it's "too expensive" to do something actually good -- they waste money left and right.