silencerp
2 years ago
[complaining about character interpretations I don't like] I don't like it when people try to make Professor Oak out to be neglectful/abusive.
latest #13
silencerp
2 years ago
There's ZERO canon evidence in ANY version of canon for it
silencerp
2 years ago
and like... you wanna give Gary/Blue/Green/whatever the fuck his name is an angsty "abusive caregivers" backstory?
silencerp
2 years ago
HIS PARENTS ARE RIGHT THERE
立即下載
silencerp
2 years ago
I've seen multiple fics where the parents are the abusive ones and that's the REASON he's living with his grandpa
silencerp
2 years ago
and like my personal headcanon is "they're dead" but "they're abusers" works too
silencerp
2 years ago
you get to have your tragic backstory WITHOUT turning a beloved character that wouldn't hurt a fly into an abuser
silencerp
2 years ago
it's win-win
silencerp
2 years ago
also the "all old people are queerphobes" cliche is tired can we retire it please
silencerp
2 years ago
so many shipping fics generating artificial conflict by suddenly making him a homophobe out of nowhere
silencerp
2 years ago
"oh he lets his 10/11-year-old grandson out into the world on his own with only a Pokemon to protect him" SO DOES EVERY SINGLE OTHER PARENT IN THE ENTIRE CANON. If it's abusive/neglectful when he does it, then it's abusive/negectful when they do it too, don't single him out on this
silencerp
2 years ago
like that's just one of the conceits of Pokemon you have to accept, that 10-year-olds in this universe ARE responsible enough for this kind of thing, or it all falls apart
silencerp
2 years ago
like you can have all the "all pokemon trainers are adults" AU's all you want, but in canon, 10 year olds are responsible
silencerp
2 years ago
https://images.plurk.com/7ClhI3sILAzVBzqQPJrWWB.png
back to top